Tuesday, August 28, 2018

Judge Dismisses Meritless TCPA Suit

In Johansen v. National Gas & Electric, the Judge has dismissed the case because the plaintiff gave the indication to the defendant that he was an interested customer before filing a lawsuit for alleged TCPA violations. Below is a key section of the Judge's analysis:

A call is excluded from the definition of a “telephone solicitation” if it is placed “to any person with that person’s prior express invitation or permission.” 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(4). When an ETM representative proposed during the June 14 call that an enrollment specialist would call plaintiff, he responded, “Okay, great. Sounds good.” Doc. 36-4 at p. 3. In the calls which followed over the next several days, plaintiff never stated that he did not wish to receive any more calls. He kept agreeing to be called by an enrollment specialist and even attempted to call NG&E to complete the enrollment process when one of the calls got cut off.

Click here to read a copy of the Judge's opinion and order. Contact a TCPA attorney if you find yourself  in a situation like this. Learn more about cell phone telemarketing laws and do-not-call regulations.

Avaya Dialing System Held to be ATDS


In Heard v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, the Court has held that the Avaya predictive dialer meets the definition of ATDS, even if the FCC's previous definitions of ATDS were overruled by the recent ACA v. FCC decision. The court zeroed in on the Avaya system's ability to "store" numbers, thus in part fitting the original statutory definition of an autodialer. Read the court's full opinion and order here. While this ruling is negative for the industry, there have been several positive rulings in recent months as well. The FCC will most likely be reevaluating its stance on autodialers in the upcoming months, as indicated in a recent letter from FCC Chairman Ajit Pai to several U.S. Senators. Although there have been court decisions on both sides of the issue, the upcoming FCC actions will be much more significant as the FCC is the agency charged with enforcing the TCPA and determining what an ATDS really is.  Learn more about the definition of ATDS, autodialer laws, robocall laws, and telemarketing compliance. Call a telemarketing lawyer if you have an urgent need that only a telemarketing law firm can help with.


FTC Publishes Tips on Spotting "Small Business Coaching Scams" 


Last week, the FTC published an article to help consumers spot alleged "Small Business Coaching Scams." Click here to read this article. Unfortunately, many legitimate businesses in the direct marketing industry are mistaken for business coaching scams. Make sure you understand what red flags consumers might see to come to this conclusion. For example, as stated in the FTC's article, "Some scammers sell bogus business coaching and internet promotion services. Using fake testimonials, videos, seminar presentations, and telemarketing calls, the scammers falsely promise amazing results and exclusive market research for people who pay their fees. They also may lure you in with low initial costs, only to ask for thousands of dollars later. In reality, the scammers leave budding entrepreneurs without the help they sought and with thousands of dollars of debt." To prevent consumers from reaching those conclusions about your business, make sure you only use real testimonials, only promise real results, and be honest about what costs are associated with your services. Reducing and resolving consumer complaints should be a priority for any direct marketing business. Learn how to respond to an Attorney General.

Monday, August 13, 2018

Michigan Court Finds that Dialers Calling from a List Do Not Automatically Qualify as ATDS

An opinion out of the Eastern District of Michigan has found that a dialer calling from a list does not automatically qualify as an ATDS under the TCPA unless it generates the dialed numbers sequentially or randomly. The court based this decision in part on the recent ACA v. FCC decision, which set aside the FCC's overly broad definition of ATDS. Read the full opinion here. Read more about the definition of ATDS, autodialer laws, robocall laws, telemarketing compliance, and cell phone telemarketing laws.

Cirque du Soleil Escapes TCPA Class Action


The popular entertainment company Cirque du Soleil has been fighting a TCPA class action lawsuit for alleged faxing violations since 2009. However, due to a recent Supreme Court decision that put an end to the tolling of the statute of limitations when class action lawsuits are pending, the case has now been dismissed. Read a detailed article about Cirque du Soleil's win here. If you are facing a TCPA class action lawsuit, contact a TCPA attorney or telemarketing lawyer.

Nevada Secretary of State Announces Office Relocation


Companies doing business in Nevada will want to take note of the Secretary of State's new address. The Nevada Secretary of State has announced that the office which handles commercial recordings, document preparation services, Nevada Lockbox, domestic partnerships, securities, and trademarks will be relocated. The office will now be in the City of North Las Vegas City Hall Building in North Las Vegas. The address is 2250 Las Vegas Boulevard North, North Las Vegas, NV 89030. Learn more about telemarketing licenses and telemarketing registrations.

Wednesday, August 8, 2018

Louisiana Increases Penalties for Violations of State's Caller-ID Spoofing Laws

Last week, Louisiana's new "Anti-Caller ID Spoofing Act" went into effect. The Act makes it illegal for a caller to "knowingly insert false information into a caller identification system with the intent to mislead, defraud, deceive, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value." The new law gives the Attorney General the authority to seek fines of up to $10,000 per violation. Additionally, consumers can now sue marketers under a new private right of action. While the amount that they can sue for isn't specified, the new law indicates that consumers can sue for, "injunctive relief, treble damages, court costs, and reasonable attorney fees." Read the text of the new law, indicating the exact changes from the old law, here. Learn about how to respond to an Attorney General. Learn more about telemarketing regulations. Consider consulting with a telemarketing attorney if you are worried that you aren't in full compliance with telemarketing laws.

Uber Facing TCPA Class Action


The popular ride sharing app Uber is facing a TCPA class action lawsuit after they allegedly send over 30 marketing text messages to a man after he opted out from receiving additional messages. The case is Shelton Bollinger v. Uber Technologies Inc. Bollinger alleges that the text messages were disruptive to his life as they were received early in the morning or late at night. Read more information about this case here. To avoid being sued in a lawsuit like this, make sure you are in compliance with all telemarketing rules. To avoid getting in trouble for telemarketing violations, be sure to understand autodialer laws, robocall laws, do not call regulations, and telemarketing license requirements. Telemarketing fines could await you if you don't practice full telemarketing compliance.

 

FTC Approves Revisions to Jewelry Guides


The FTC has approved significant revisions to its "Guide for the Jewelry, Precious Metals, and Pewter Industries." The goal of the revisions was to further prevent deception in jewelry marketing. A brief summary of the changes from the FTC's press release is as follows:

Using comments and information obtained during a June 2013 public roundtable, in January 2016, the agency proposed, and sought public comments on, revisions to the Guides regarding below-threshold alloys, precious metal content of products containing more than one precious metal, surface application of precious metals, lead-glass filled stones, “cultured” diamonds, treated pearls, varietals, and misuse of the word “gem.”

Based on the overall record, the Commission has approved revisions to help align the Jewelry Guides with Section 5 of the FTC Act by tying guidance to consumer expectations, and to address technological developments and related changes in industry practice, providing needed clarification and greater flexibility for businesses.

Specifically, the revisions address (1) surface application of precious metals, (2) alloys with precious metals in amounts below minimum thresholds, (3) products containing more than one precious metal, (4) composite gemstone products, (5) varietals, (6) “cultured” diamonds, (7) qualifying claims about man-made gemstone products, (8) pearl treatment disclosures, (9) use of the term “gem,” (10) misleading illustrations, (11) the definition of “diamond,” and (12) exemptions recognized in the assay for gold, silver, and platinum.


Read the full FTC press release here.

FTC Returns Money to Consumers Targeted by Alleged Debt Collection Scheme


Nearly 600 checks totaling over $184,000 will be sent to consumers who were allegedly deceived by defendant Delaware Solutions into paying phony debts. The defendants agreed to the financial settlement and they have been banned from the debt collection industry. Read the full press release about this issue here.